+100%-

Check out Geoff’s narration

The GIST

The Blog

 

A blog on Tick-borne Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) might not be what you expect on a chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), long COVID website. While CCHFV is a major problem in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia it’s not in North America or Europe. A recent study suggests, though, that it may not matter where a bug comes from when it comes to postviral illnesses.

Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) Virus (40689899455)

The Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) Virus may sound exotic but its postviral effects looked all too familiar.

Thanks to Kajsa for digging this one up – I never would have seen it otherwise.  The only word in the title “Systems-level temporal immune-metabolic profile in Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus infection” that gives any clue to the goodies contained inside is the word “temporal”: the researchers followed the CCHFV patients over time and that made all the difference.

The Study

In this Swedish/UK/Turkish study, the Swedish (Karolinska Institute) and UK researchers appear to have done the deep dive into the biology while the Turkish researchers provided the sick patients. Good for the Swedish Research Council for funding an interesting study.

With a fatality ranging from 5% (Turkey) to up to 50% in some African countries, CCHVF is a nasty disease that makes the coronavirus – at least in some countries – look like a relative piker. All the patients in this study were hospitalized and all experienced fever plus there was headache (97%), muscle ache (93%), weakness (90%), and nausea and/or vomiting (70%).  Some sort of bleeding problem was observed in half of the patients.

This study assessed the transcriptomics (gene expression) of immune cells in 30 hospitalized patients and 30 healthy controls from infection onset to about a month later. Some high-level data analyses including network-based systems, analysis, digital cell quantification (DCQ), and temporal pathogenic alterations by time series clustering) were used.

THE GIST

  • Check out Geoff’s narration of the GIST and the Blog on the top of the blog.
  • A blog on Tick-borne Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) might not be what you expect on a chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), long COVID website. A recent study, though, suggests that it might not matter where a pathogen comes from when it comes to postviral illnesses.
  • CCHFV – a major threat in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia – can produce high fatality rates in some parts of Africa. This Swedish/Turkish study assessed the gene expression of immune cells to determine how the immune cells of hospitalized CCHFV patients responded to the infection over time.
  • Energy demands soared in the early stages of the infection creating a “hypermetabolic state” in the immune cells as they revved up their engines to battle the pathogen. The upregulation of ATP production, increased use of amino acids, and a turn toward fatty acid oxidation during the infection demonstrated the cells were under tremendous energy and cellular stressors.
  • The ability to generate energy was crucial: patients whose cells had to turn to alternative energy sources to fight the virus were sicker off.
  • That early hypermetabolic period had its cost. Thirty days later, after the pathogen had apparently been vanquished (or mostly vanquished) several findings suggested an “energy maladjustment” had occurred and the patient’s immune cells were in a state of “metabolic insufficiency”.
  • Despite having apparently fought off the virus, the vast majority of patients (83%) were experiencing fatigue and pain and many also experienced weight loss, headache, heart palpitations, and sweating; i.e. they were in a state of postviral illness similar to that seen in ME/CFS and long COVID.
  • The authors concluded that “metabolic rewiring” i.e. problems with cellular energy production “potentially leads to postviral fatigue” and noted how many different viral infections (Dengue fever, SARS-CoV-2, the West Nile, Ebola, and Marburg viruses) produce symptoms (fatigue/weakness, headache, dizziness, musculoskeletal pain, and cognitive and sleep disorders) similar to those found in ME/CFS.
  • The key finding is that when it comes to postviral illnesses it may all be about the ability (or inability) of our cells to produce energy. Something appeared to happen early in the infection to affect energy production 30 days later. While we don’t know if this problem persists the findings from this Crimean-Congo virus study are very similar to what we see in conditions like long COVID and ME/CFS.
  • Evidence of natural killer, T, and B-cell exhaustion has been found in ME/CFS and a recent Stanford presentation found that overstressed mitochondria in ME/CFS patients T-cells were breaking down causing them to release high levels of free radicals/reactive oxygen species. Metabolomic studies in another post-viral illness – post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome have also stressed problems with energy production.
  • The big question is what happens during the infection to whack the energy-producing elements of the cell leaving it in an exhausted state.

Findings

The results were fascinating. The usual suspects – mostly innate immune cells (myeloid cells, monocytes, NK cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells and T-cells) – showed up in spades during the infection, but the real juice was in the metabolic findings.

Energy demands

The immune cells ramped up their energy production during the acute phase of the infection.

Energy demands soared in the early stages of the infection creating a “hypermetabolic state” in the immune cells as they revved up their engines to battle the pathogen. The upregulation of ATP production, increased use of amino acids, and a turn toward fatty acid oxidation during the infection demonstrated the cells were under tremendous energy and cellular stressors.

Those patients whose immune cells couldn’t keep up with the metabolic demands were forced to turn to alternative anaerobic energy pathways (glycolysis/pyruvate metabolism) to generate energy. These patients were worse off – suggesting that an inability of their cells to generate suitable amounts of energy resulted in a more severe illness.

That early hypermetabolic period had its cost. Thirty days later, after the pathogen had apparently been vanquished (or mostly vanquished) several findings suggested their immune cells had not recovered. Their energy production (glycolysis, TCA cycle, OXPHOS) fell so much that the researchers concluded that an “energy maladjustment” had occurred and they were in a state of “metabolic insufficiency”

The patients looked like it. The vast majority of patients (83%) were experiencing fatigue strong enough to inhibit their daily activities leading the authors to conclude they were in a postviral fatigue state. Besides fatigue, musculoskeletal pain (75%), anorexia (50%), weight loss (50%), headache (38%), palpitation (38%), and sweating (38%) were found.

The authors concluded that “metabolic rewiring during the recovery phase potentially leads to postviral fatigue”. Bringing chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) into the mix they noted the different viral infections (Dengue fever, SARS-CoV-2, the West Nile, Ebola, and Marburg viruses) all produce neuropsychiatric symptoms (fatigue/weakness, headache, dizziness, musculoskeletal pain, and cognitive and sleep disorders) similar to those found in ME/CFS. (They could have mentioned more pathogens: herpesviruses, Giardia, Coxsackie B).

Because the study lasted for 30 days we don’t know if the metabolic changes were maintained or if they were associated with the development of “long CCHF”.

The metabolic rewiring seen in these shorter-duration patients appears to mirror, though, those seen in people with ME/CFS and long COVID; i.e. downregulation of aerobic energy production and increased use of a dirty fuel source – amino acids.

Recapitulation

Energy production plummets

Energy production plummeted in the “recovery” period leaving the patients fatigued, in pain, etc.

So here we have an interesting scenario. In the acute or early phase of the infection, the immune cells experience a dramatic increase in the demand for their energy – a demand that metabolically rewires the cell causing increased ATP production via the OXPHOS pathway in the mitochondria, and begins burning more fatty acids and amino acids.

The more effective the immune cells at meeting their energy demands the better they can fight off the infection and the better off the patients are. In some people, their cellular energy reserves get tapped out, and they resort to using an alternative energy source (pyruvate/glycolysis). People in this group tend to be sicker.

During the recovery phase, the energy-producing pathways were downregulated – but not to normal levels – downregulated to the point of “metabolic insufficiency”. At this point, about 30 days after the original infection, many patients reported they’re fatigued, are in pain, can’t sleep well, have cognitive problems, etc.; i.e. they appear to have postviral fatigue.

The key finding is that it’s all about energy! How well a person can fend off a pathogen depends on the ability of their immune cells to produce high amounts of energy. If the immune cells can’t do that well they will get sicker.

The big question, of course, is why the immune cells found themselves in a hypometabolic state 30 days later or even years later in ME/CFS.

The Postviral Energy Drain

A similar energy drain may be occurring in the NK, T, and B-cells in ME/CFS. Vishnu Shankar’s ME/CFS study (unpublished) suggested that overstressed mitochondria in T-cells were breaking down and releasing high levels of free radicals/reactive oxygen species. Those high levels then damaged the mitochondria – causing even more oxidative stress – and throwing people with ME/CFS into a vicious cycle. Mark Davis even suggested that the energy drain from the immune cells could be siphoning energy off from the brain resulting in brain fog.

The Vampire: Is the Immune System Sucking the Energy Out of People with ME/CFS? – the NIH ME/CFS Conference Pt. I

Something similar may be going on in the B-cells. A 2018 study found these cells had been metabolically rewired as well. The more glycolysis was used to produce energy and the greater the lactate production (a by-product of glycolysis), the more likely the B-cells in ME/CFS patients remained in a “naïve” or less active functional state. A 2024 study suggested that the B-cells in ME/CFS were dragging. Once stimulated the ME/CFS patient’s B-cells exhibited lower mitochondrial masses than the healthy control cells plus they, too, turned to using essential amino acids for energy.

Over in another post-pathogenic condition – post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) – a metabolomic study highlighted alterations in an array of factors (glycerophospholipid metabolism, bile acid, carnitine) that are broadly involved in fatty acid metabolism and energy production. The authors noted the dramatic overlap between PTLDS and ME/CFS:

The classes of metabolites identified in this study are similar to those described in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Similar to our findings, changes in glycerophospholipid, aromatic and branched-chain amino acid, carnitine, bile acid, fatty acid, and sphingolipid metabolism were described in studies involving patients with ME/CFS.

Something appears to happen early in an infection to whack the ability (or desire?) of these immune cells to produce energy. They may be hunkering down to avoid damage aka Naviaux’s Dauer proposition and/or may be too damaged to function properly. In any case, it’s startling to see energy problems crop up in so many immune cells.

Given we know of ME/CFS and long COVID, though, something like that makes sense. In an upcoming “What’s Up Doc?” blog, Nancy Klimas will note that the immune system has so many backup systems that it would require multiple hits for the viral reactivation found in ME/CFS and long COVID to occur.

The authors of the CCHRF paper ended by stating “A better understanding of the immuno-metabolic mechanism of the postviral fatigue in CCHF patients can identify therapeutic targets for better and faster recovery.” One wonders if the sentence would better read “A better understanding of the immuno-metabolic mechanism of post-viral fatigue can identify therapeutic targets for better and faster recovery”

Please Support Health Rising and Keep the Information Flowing

GIVE A ONE-TIME DONATION


GIVE MONTHLY



HEALTH RISING IS NOT A 501 (c) 3 NON-PROFIT

Stay Up to Date with ME/CFS, Long COVID and Fibromyalgia News

Get Health Rising's free blogs featuring the latest findings and treatment options for the ME/CFS, long COVID, fibromyalgia and complex chronic disease communities. 

Thank you for signing up!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This