Hip
Well-Known Member
One thing to think about though. At the time of the name creation the CDC estimates of CFS prevalence were really, really low I believe - too low I would think for the insurance companies to get involved.
I should think that the disability insurance companies will have their own radar for the number of new ME/CFS cases each year, because these companies will be receiving the actual insurance claims on these cases. So these companies will readily detect any increase in the yearly incidence.
CFS was created in 1988, so presumably by that stage, these insurance companies would have noticed a large increase in the annual number of insurance claims for ME/CFS, as the explosion in incidence occurred from the beginning of the 1980s.
For those who might think the CDC is in the pocket of the insurance companies
I am just guessing at how these insurance companies operates, but I imagine there would not be any systemic influence on the CDC by insurance companies; probably more something along the lines of trying to place one or two insurance-friendly personnel into the CDC committees and decision-making groups related to CFS, who then try their best to steer the decisions in a direction that benefits the insurance companies.
I imagine that may have been one of the reasons why Wessely later got involved with the CDC and shaping the CFS concept.
Wessely at one stage was evening trying to modify the World Health Organization ICD definition of myalgic encephalomyelitis, trying to reclassify ME as a psychologically-caused condition. Wessely claimed he had the authority to do this, but was reprimanded by the WHO for attempting it. The WHO told him that he did not, as he claimed, have the authority to issue a WHO ICD definition. This incident just shows how those like Wessely will simply try it on, and see what they can get away with.
Last edited: