Zapped
Well-Known Member
If it wasnt for antivirals i would be on a disability pension. They arent a cure but have kept me more functional .
I have tried traditional stims and the effects were awful and it seems to be the case for the majority of cfsers who try them. I even tried a very low dose reboxetine, a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor , and had horrible insomnia that sleep mefs couldnt overcome.
I think it was cheney that stated stims and many stimulating antidepressants eventually burn your neurons to dust. Occassional use vs continuous use is probably very different .
So i guess pick your poison which works for you.
I fail to see why you chose to support an antagonistic disparity but since you opined I'll respond to the contents of your proclamation for clarification.
Firstly, I have followed the good (?) Dr. Cheney and his babbling since he left Lake Tahoe. He needed an enema then and more so, now,
this time fill the bag with memory salts along with potions of good science.
Just because you feel better eating Frosted Flakes or taking anti virals, does nothing to substantiate that 'the majority of PWC's' get the same results when they do. Nor have I seen statistics, nor studies, nor anecdotes of the like from the majority. So this claim really amounts to nothing more than hearsay... . Plus, it doesn't describe any sort of methodology.
Further, your results could be from one sector of a non-homogeneous group here that suffers from some unrelated or unknown disease that mimics ME/CFS/SEID, Ie its symptoms - and the list is long. I can unequivocally lay claim that the makeup of these CFS forums consists of people with multiple unrelated illnesses, having attended in person, CFS groups and participating in online research and groups since the very first one, circa 1990, and before.
These 'others' do not exclude convalescents with undiagnosed or unknown illnesses, overlappers, psychiatric cases and just plain malingerers and trolls with nowhere else to get a voice! My experience would venture a guesstimate that of the participants in any of these CFS groups, i.e. those with nebulous etiologies, that the 'real' PWCs would not exceed 70%... .
As for a reubtake inhibitor of adrenaline, it has very different affects than pure ethical amphetimine salts which elevate dopamine, versus inducing a certain nervous condition. May I refer you to CNS Pharmacology... .
Also anecdotally, and in contrast to your officious statement, I started a protocol circa 1990, of Adderall, along with Klonopin, earlier, and added sleep meds (in rotation). I ocasionally stop one or two (different) for a 90-day period to limit dependence. These are doctor(s) written and approved pursuant to my providing justifying research, in way low doses, sub-clinical, taken concurrently with various supplements, along with a Paleo diet. The trick is getting the balance right to reap the benefits while limiting the downside.
While I don't drink, (gave it up 35 years ago) I believe this protocol is analogous to having 1-2 glasses of wine daily, versus a fifth of vodka, which your assumptions imply.
PWCs using anti vitals when I (and some % of 'experts') believe CFS is a stress induced systemic malfunction, is endangering to the kidneys and liver, along with who knows what else (re
'The Clinician's Guide to Virology,) that the makers and prescribers don't even know. Aside from being able to kill you slowly, AV's have been shown to have an immune modulating affects, which is why some people report feeling 'better', which in turn may translate to feeling "up from deathly down.'' (I see I Herxing as medical doublespeak to justify any deviations as to the prescriber's guessing that X-correct dosing will advance his/her efforts.). The rest is 'maybe... .
...Indeed, here's to mud in yer eye!
Last edited: